My Canon HV20 Short is making the festival rounds – some notes about the workflow
I shot a short film titled A Killer App as the final project for a directing class at UCLA Extension. We used my Canon HV20 exclusively, with the aperture locked to as wide an aperture as possible – a 2.8 f stop in order to get as much light hitting the sensor and to get a shallower depth of field. Footage was brought in via Firewire into Sony Vegas and then converted to Lagarith Lossless using the methods described by Eugenia to export into After Effects for color grading, cinematic cross fades, power windows, visual effects and titling and then exported back into Vegas using Lagarith again.
The final cut was exported as an uncompressed AVI (a huge file even for a ten minute short) which was then used as the new master video file so that various export formats could be created. Among these were the ProRes 4:2:2 using the Avid HDxDN codec 10-bit at 1080p / 23.976 which we dumped onto a drive and handed off to a friend at a post facility so that he could transfer this as an archival master to an HDCAM SR tape. Yes, you will likely tell me that this is overkill as the HV20 records in a 4:2:0 colorspace and is a highly compressed format to begin with, but some festivals (Sundance for example) still require HDCAM tape for exhibition, and so we wanted to have our bases covered.
While working in Vegas we assumed that we would export at 32-bit video levels but worked in 8-bit for smoother playback and due to the fact that we had at least 4 video tracks and multiple audio.
But I have learned a lot since then.
First of all – these cameras only have about 4 stops dynamic range. This means that the actual mise-en-scene is very important. Don’t shoot people wearing black against white walls. Instead work with a narrower palette – try to keep contrasts narrower – and that applies to wardrobe, set design, lighting styles. Also, learn to use a light meter, and use it, and shoot as flat and neutral as possible; although colored gels may seem fun at the time, remember that this isn’t high school theater – that red gel will squish your actors face into the same color space as the wall behind them unless you are very careful, and you will find getting a proper skin tone out of them in post next to impossible. (Not to mention the fact that the camera’s respective color channels respond differently to different colors – you may not seem to be clipping your highlights, but you could be clipping a color channel).
In post I would begin by capturing or immediately converting captured footage into Cineform using NeoScene (which converts to a 4:2:2 colorspace) and cut that directly on the Vegas timeline in 8-bit while piecing things together and again exporting at 32-bit video levels. This is not going to be a comprehensive post about all the settings or best practices, but just some notes about how we did it and what we got. The bottom line is, we tried to stick to first generation material as far as possible, but we ended up going into Lagarith twice, both times exporting at 32-bit, and then once more for the final output. Needless to say the tech guys at the post facility called to tell us that the HDCAM SR version they watched looked super sharp and high end. Unfortunately, I haven’t seen it off the tape. They also said the sound was really good:
While working with the audio tracks (which were recorded using the Rode VideoMic with a 10db pad on plugged straight into the HV20) in Vegas, each character’s dialogue was checkerboarded – cut onto its own track and heads and tails were trimmed right to the edge. We made sure to have recorded and included real room tone from the day, and spent another two days looping any dialogue that was bad due to extraneous noise or for being too far off mic.

On the set of A Killer App, shot with the Canon HV20. Photo by Jessica Marshall-Gardiner
A lot of fun was also had building the environments, background ambience, sound effects -these little details can help a production enormously. The well known golden rule is that sound is paramount. Your video can be just OK, but if the sound is no good, then you are sunk.
We found some excellent soundtrack music by simply asking some appropriate sounding bands on MySpace, and then sending them a music release form which they signed, scanned and emailed back.
Region 0 NTSC DVDs were made and shipped out to a couple dozen festivals and we won an Award of Merit at Accolade, and were accepted in the Glastonbury Horror Festival in the UK. We have yet to hear from about half our submissions who don’t report until later in the year, but so far so good.
Incidentally, if you are not yet aware of Withoutabox.com and you are an indie filmmaker – then go learn it now. It is a one-stop shop for thousands of film festivals and you can submit directly through the site. Note that while use of the site is free, festivals are not – each submission will set you back an average of 25 to 50 dollars US.
A side benefit of using Withoutabox.com, however, is the eventual IMDB page you are given. This is a great way to get your film indexed and noticed by millions of daily visitors to the portal. Also, Amazon owns it so there are opportunities to put your short up for sale through that company.
Regardless of where you are in your development as an independent filmmaker, I hope some of the experience I have shared above will be of use to you.
Please feel free to add any notes in the comment section below about working with your Canon HV20 and Sony Vegas, Lagarith, Cineform, After Effects, post production workflow and deliverables or how you have been marketing and distributing your final product.
Nikon D90 or Canon 50D MK II – Twitterstream
ConstantChange
To @5tu and @EugeniaLoli – friend got hands on Nikon D90 – prefer or not over Canon 50D Mk II?
Stu Maschwitz
5tu @ConstantChange Not.
from Tweetie in reply to ConstantChange
ConstantChange
@5tu I guessed so. The footage I’m seeing from the D90 really looks nice though. http://ri.ms/rfv4 (D90 Grammy spot shot by friend)
from web in reply to 5tu
EugeniaLoli
@ConstantChange That’s because the scenes are so short that you don’t get to see all the disadvantages of the D90. Choose 5D.
from web in reply to ConstantChange
ConstantChange
@EugeniaLoli Cheers, as I told Stu Maschwitz – that was what I suspected, wanted to confirm it remained true after firmware updates etc ty!
from web in reply to EugeniaLoli
~~~
ConstantChange
The film we are shooting in Hawai’i right now is using a RED camera
~~~
EugeniaLoli
Ordered the Rode Stereo VideoMic, a dead kitten for it, and a 2.5 m boom pole too. Should be fun.
ConstantChange
@EugeniaLoli – I love the rode mic for my HV20. Have the boom pole too but the attachment screw for it is not well designed.
~~~
(Meanwhile back on Stu’s Twittertstream:)
Stu Maschwitz
@debonbon Actually (Nikon D90′s) 720p is a wonderful resolution if everything else is done well. What Nikon needs is manual control.
Tyler Ginter
@5tu If rolling shutter is the same on the D300s as the D90 and D5000 then Nikon is just showing how little pride they take in video… IMO
Stu Maschwitz
@tylerginter Agreed. The 5D2′s rolling shutter is nasty but workable. The D90′s is a dealbreaker.
5 minutes ago from Tweetie in reply to tylerginter
—–
Eugenia Loli is a videographer, tech journalist, developer who writes an excellent blog about video, post-production and color correction at http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/
Stu Maschwitz is a founder of The Orphanage and author of the DV Rebel’s Toolkit. he runs http://prolost.com/ an astounding resource on everything from After Effects and color timing to the very latest in HD cameras and shooting techniques.
Constant Change is the author of this blog.
**Full disclosure – although Stu and Eugenia are both critical and discerning and do not work for either of the companies being discussed, I did first come across each of them through their enthusiasm for, and my interest in, the Canon HV20 camera.
Canon HV20 vs HV30 vs HV40 – What’s the Difference?
Canon has announced the release of the Vixia HV40 – the next iteration of the Canon HV20 HDV camcorder that we have so come to love here at thehv20experiments.com.
With the HV30, not much changed except for a new black paint job, the ability to shoot 30P and a slightly bigger LCD screen.

Canon Vixia HV40 HDV Camcorder
With the HV40 – same thing except that Canon has since done some optimization of it DIGIC II processor for HD, and more importantly, added the ability to shoot 24P (something we will also see the company adding to its new HD Video-shooting DSLRs like the 5D MK II in response to overwhelming user demand).
The main thing to consider is that with any of the tweaks and tips and tricks you have already learned by visiting this site, you can accomplish anything that can be accomplished with the HV40 with ease.
Click here to see a side-by-side comparison of the three models and their respective feature sets.
Interestingly, the Canon HV20 is the only one of the three that offers SD/MiniDV recording at all. Why you would think this is a bonus is up for debate, but you never know – sometimes lower quality formats become desirable for retro effects or otherwise and presently the HV20 is the only one to offer this flexibility.
The HV40, being a new product will set you back a thousand bucks. The HV30 is now going for around seven hundred give or take. But not much has changed since the HV20 which was used to shoot parts of the sequel to Crank starring Jason Statham and in theaters nationwide, and can be found for as little as US$399.
Looking at the basic math, the Canon HV20 is still the way to go.
You may also consider looking at Canon’s other offerings, however, if you prefer to not use HDV tapes (which are basically good quality MiniDV tapes) and go solid state. That is something I will cover in a future article.




















